<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rights on Nick Perkins Archive</title><link>https://archive.nickperkins.au/tags/rights/</link><description>Recent content in Rights on Nick Perkins Archive</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 01:25:54 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://archive.nickperkins.au/tags/rights/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Marriage – why do I have the right, but not gay people?</title><link>https://archive.nickperkins.au/nicholosophy/marriage-why-do-i-have-the-right-but-not-gay-people/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 01:25:54 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://archive.nickperkins.au/nicholosophy/marriage-why-do-i-have-the-right-but-not-gay-people/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There was an equal love/gay marriage march held in Brisbane today. Sadly I didn’t make it due to other plans, but from what I understand it received an excellent turnout. I’m not going to talk about the march, since I wasn’t there. However I do want to cover the topic of gay marriage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Marriage Act in Australia specifies that marriage is between a man and a woman. This clarification was added to the act by the Howard Government, which isn’t surprising really. I think it was in their last term in office as well. When the Rudd Labor Government came to power, much was done to bring many rights for gay people into line with those for straight people. This includes recognising gay couples as being the same as ‘de facto’ couples and therefore receiving basically the same rights as any heterosexual couple. The right to get married was not included in this though.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>